That may make the hike sound like it was boring, and truthfully, that might have been the case. It was more or less the same as all of the many other times I've hiked this route.
But that is the point. This hike was further proof for me that my recovery is moving along well. I'm moving closer to a training phase where I left off before my hernia-repair surgery. I'm not just in a recovery phase.
That doesn’t mean I’ve recovered. It would be foolish of me to think that. I'm still following my doctor's advice and will take care to not overdo my training.
I'm also not fooling myself into thinking my thru-hike attempt is a slam dunk. There's no certainty I can finish on Mt. Katahdin.
To be honest, the opposite is more likely to be true. The odds appear to be stacked against me. A quick look at statistics from the Appalachian Trail Conservancy (ATC) bears out that view.
There were 3,377 hikers who left Springer Mountain last year to hike north. Nearly all of them intended to finish in Maine. A year later, only 620 hikers reported they completed their hike.
Late in the last decade, the percentage of successfully completed thru-hikes had risen to 30 percent. Since then, though, the percentage has dropped to around 25 percent.
The trail hasn't gotten more difficult in that time. Indeed, you could argue it’s now easier. Backpacking equipment has become lighter, the number of trail-related services has increased, and cellphone reception has improved. But if it's now easier to complete a thru-hike, why don’t the statistics show that?
Maybe the reason completions have dropped is because the number of ill-prepared hikers who attempt a thru-hike has increased. I'm unsure if that's true and there's no way to measure a statistic for that.
Still, the numbers make clear it's a formidable challenge for anyone to hike all 2,190 miles in one year. I doubt anyone needs to see the numbers to understand that.
On a statistical basis then, I have a one-in-four chance of succeeding in my attempt to walk from Georgia to Maine.
Or do I?
I recently watched a YouTube video by a woman named Dirty Bunny who was attempting to thru-hike the AT. She told about the owner of a hostel who discussed some of those same statistics I just mentioned.
Dirty Bunny shared one more statistic which momentarily shocked me. She said the hostel owner told her the most successful group of hikers are those over the age of 60. In fact, he claimed older hikers have a success rate of 90 percent.
I haven't been able to verify that number. Even if we reject it as a made-up number, we can see how the success rate for thru-hikers over 60 could be higher than the overall average.
Older hikers are less likely to attempt a thru-hike without considering the challenges and understanding the risks. Most likely, a desire to thru-hike has been burning inside them for years but they had to make sure their job, family, finances, and health were taken care of first.
Dirty Bunny said about the same thing. Older hikers have dealt with life for a longer time. That makes them better equipped to handle the mental grind that comes from hiking for days in rain, snow, heat, and cold, and going without the normal comforts of home for an extended time.
In other words, I think being 61 years old improves my chance of success.
There is one more reason, a much more significant reason, I must add as an explanation for why I have a better chance of success. I have a partner who is committed just as strongly as I am to completing my thru-hike goal.